|
|
| |
12-26-2011, 04:41 PM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 155
Thanks: 10
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
|
Efficiency proposal
Many of us are interested in specific packages, not in all of them.
For that reason, is any chance to group clines in relation with packages?
It will be more easy to select the cline dedicated to desirable package and decrease, on the other hand, the overloading of the server.
|
|
|
12-26-2011, 07:36 PM
|
#2
|
|
Board Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 243
Thanks: 83
Thanked 35 Times in 30 Posts
|
Re: Efficiency proposal
i agree. some of us here may even have a fixed dish. just don't know if it will affect the moderators' workload but will definitely decrease the servers' workload.
some members post newcamd for.specific packages though.
|
|
|
12-28-2011, 03:38 PM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 155
Thanks: 10
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
|
Re: Efficiency proposal
Could I kindly ask one of the mederators to specify if my proposal can be implemented or at least taken into consideration?
|
|
|
12-28-2011, 04:42 PM
|
#4
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,560
Thanks: 60
Thanked 688 Times in 358 Posts
|
Re: Efficiency proposal
I didn't discussed this yet with the team, but i can tell you, your request is technical impossible to accomplish
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to uttnls For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-28-2011, 11:14 PM
|
#5
|
|
Experienced Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 460
Thanks: 64
Thanked 92 Times in 76 Posts
|
Re: Efficiency proposal
Wouldnt this be exactly like the newcamd protocol where each card is grouped via what port is goes through or something like that? Thats why CCCAM has everything on it...
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:13 AM.
|
|
|
|
|